Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Exploring the action of new FimH inhibitors against CTX–15 enzyme by enzoinformatics approach: A plausible arsenal against drug-resistant uropathogenic bacterial strains

Amir Saeed1,2 , Khalid Alshaghdali1,3, Mohd Saeed3, Mousa Alreshidi3,4

1Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Medical Microbiology Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan; 3Molecular Diagnostic and Personalized Therapeutic Unit, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Biology, College of Sciences, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

For correspondence:-  Amir Saeed   Email: am.saeed@uoh.edu.sa   Tel:+966543099741

Accepted: 6 October 2021        Published: 30 November 2021

Citation: Saeed A, Alshaghdali K, Saeed M, Alreshidi M. Exploring the action of new FimH inhibitors against CTX–15 enzyme by enzoinformatics approach: A plausible arsenal against drug-resistant uropathogenic bacterial strains. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(11):2363-2370 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i11.19

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the potency of FimH inhibitors against CTX-M β-lactamase enzyme type 15, in view of the increasing prevalence of CTX-M 15 in uropathogenic strains which has reduced the treatment options to minimal.
Method: FimH inhibitors were targeted against CTXM-15 by a molecular docking approach. Thereafter, the best ligand-target confirmation was selected and analyzed using LIGPLOT+ Version v.2.1. The hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding among the catalytic site amino acids of CTXM-15 and the FimH inhibitors were analyzed and 3-D structures were converted into 2-D images by LIGPLOT algorithm.
Results: Out of all the FimH inhibitors tested, 3′-chloro-4′- (α-D-mannopyranosyloxy) biphenyl-4-carbonitrile, para-biphenyl-2-methyl-3′-methylamidemannoside, para-biphenyl-2-methyl-3′,5′di-methylamide-α-D-mannoside, and thiazolylamino mannoside exhibited better interaction with the CTX-M 15 active site than the positive control avibactam. Moreover, in CTX-M 15, the amino acid residues, Ser70, Tyr105, Ser130, Asn132, Thr216, Thr235, Gly236, and Ser237 were commonly interacting with these FimH inhibitors as well as avibactam.
Conclusion: The predicted findings suggest that these FimH inhibitors could be explored as potential CTX-M 15 inhibitors to cope-up with resistance issues of uropathogenic bacteria in the form of an alternate strategy.

Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, CTX-M 15 enzyme, Extended-spectrum ?-lactamases, FimH, Urinary tract infections, Uropathogenic bacteria

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates